Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40757209›Full record

ArticleAquaculture nutrition2025

Exploring

Ana Galindo, José A Pérez, Annia Mora, Diana B Reis, Eduardo Almansa, Ignacio A Jiménez, Maria Carmo Barreto, Marianna Venuleo, Nieves G Acosta, Covadonga Rodríguez

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aquaculture nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana GalindoDepartment of Animal Biology, Soil Science and Geology, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3582-2242
José A PérezDepartment of Animal Biology, Soil Science and Geology, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5662-7246
Annia MoraDepartment of Animal Biology, Soil Science and Geology, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Diana B ReisDepartment of Animal Biology, Soil Science and Geology, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1373-4818
Eduardo AlmansaCanary Islands Oceanographic Center, Spanish Institute of Oceanography (IEO), CSIC, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1015-1334
Ignacio A JiménezAntonio González University Institute of Bio-Organic Chemistry, Department of Organic Chemistry, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0641-607X
Maria Carmo BarretoAzorean Biodiversity Group and Global Change and Sustainability Institute (CHANGE), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5797-8913
Marianna VenuleoDepartment of Biotechnology, Technological Institute of the Canary Islands, Santa Lucía de Tirajana, Gran Canaria, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9728-4550
Nieves G AcostaDepartment of Animal Biology, Soil Science and Geology, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0475-1744
Covadonga RodríguezDepartment of Animal Biology, Soil Science and Geology, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2805-0048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feeding marine larvae commonly relies on live prey, which must be enriched with lipid emulsions and/or microalgae rich in long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA) before being added to larval tanks. This enrichment enhances the nutritional value of live feed and supports larval health and growth. Microalgae are also used in aquaculture as a primary feed source for larvae and for maintaining water quality. However, in-house microalgal cultures are costly, prone to contamination, and require complex harvesting. Sourcing live microalgae from external specialized facilities is also expensive and complicated, as it involves transporting highly diluted biomass, creating a major bottleneck in hatcheries. Consequently, alternative formats of microalgal biomass, including fresh or dried forms, are gaining attention for their ease of use, nutritional stability, and antioxidant potential. To evaluate some of these concentrated biomass substitutes, different formats of

Indexed as

antioxidant capacityaquaculture industryArtemiaIsochrysis galbanalipid profilenutritive valuerotifer

Identifiers

PMID40757209
PMCPMC12318626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.