ArticleNPJ dementia2025
High inter-rater reliability in consensus diagnoses and overall assessment in the Asian Cohort for Alzheimer's Disease Study.
Article in NPJ dementia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protocol for the Asian Cohort for Alzheimer's Disease (ACAD) Study.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Asian Cohort for Alzheimer's Disease (ACAD) study is a collaborative investigation of genetic and non-genetic risk factors for AD among Asian Americans and Canadians. Harmonization of diagnostic procedures across recruiting sites will be key to the dataset's efficacy. Forty-two participants who completed the consensus process across seven ACAD recruiting sites were re-reviewed by two further impartial raters. Cohen's Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate inter-rater agreement. The findings reveal the highest level of observed agreement at 88% and a Cohen's Kappa of 0.835, among site consensus participants and two levels of external review, affirming the reliability of our protocol. ACAD has developed a data collection and diagnostic process that allows consistency among sites that serve Asians speaking Korean, Chinese, and Vietnamese languages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.