ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Switching to Faricimab for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy with Real-World Outcomes in Refractory Cases - The FAR-PEARL Study Report 1.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Outcomes of Faricimab for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy in a Multi-ethnic Cohort: A 12-Month Retrospective Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Advances in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy (PCV) Management: Emerging Evidence for Faricimab and Aflibercept 8 mg.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Review
- Neovascular age-related macular degeneration management - Beyond anti-VEGF.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To present real-world outcomes of switching to faricimab in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) refractory to previous anti-VEGF treatments. Methods: This retrospective study included PCV eyes switched to faricimab for recurrent PCV (>180 days from prior anti-VEGF treatment), suboptimal extension (60-180 days), or recalcitrant PCV (<60 days). Patients were followed monthly, with PRN reinjections for persistent subretinal fluid (SRF), intraretinal fluid (IRF), or pigment epithelial detachment (PED) at the fovea, or a 1-line vision drop. The primary outcome was time to injection-free status (no injection for 3 months), analyzed via survival analysis. Results: We included 49 eyes with PCV (mean age 66.1 ± 9.5 years; 59% women), 29% had recurrent PCV, 37% suboptimal extension, and 34% recalcitrant disease. Patients had a median of 8 prior anti-VEGF injections,the majority being aflibercept and received a median of 3 faricimab injections (Interquartile range (IQR)=2-4, range=1-8)) over 344 days (IQR=198-446). The interval between the first two faricimab injections averaged 64 ± 43 days, longer in recurrent (86 ± 55 days) vs recalcitrant PCV (43 ± 26 days, p=0.008). By day 90, 49% were injection-free, increasing to 73% by day 210. PED resolved in 53% after the first dose, and in those needing repeat injections, the interval peaked after the fourth dose with no SRF, IRF, nor PED. Conclusion: The differential response to faricimab in PCV depends on disease type, with recurrent cases requiring fewer injections and recalcitrant cases requiring more intensive initial treatment; however, even recalcitrant eyes can achieve extended intervals after initial doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.