Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40757090›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025

Exploring Junior Residents' Barriers in Mobilizing Social Capital and Their Coping: A Qualitative Ego Social Network Study.

Gerbrich Galema, Götz J K G Wietasch, Debbie A D C Jaarsma, Jasperina Brouwer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gerbrich GalemaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), and part of Lifelong Learning, Education and Assessment Research Network (LEARN), She is an anesthesiologist at the department of anesthesiology, NL.ORCID 0000-0002-5971-4855
Götz J K G WietaschUniversity of Groningen, UMCG, Department of Anesthesiology, He is also part of LEARN, NL.ORCID 0000-0001-8001-5648
Debbie A D C JaarsmaUtrecht University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, She is also part of LEARN, NL.ORCID 0000-0003-1668-2002
Jasperina BrouwerUniversity of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, with expertise in qualitative and quantitative research and social network analysis, NL.ORCID 0000-0002-7332-9320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Residents rely on social support from team members to navigate patient care, while also facing challenges integrating into the healthcare team. Although prior research has explored help-seeking behavior, little attention has been given to how residents overcome barriers to mobilizing social resources. This study explores how, in daily clinical practice, do residents perceive and respond to barriers in accessing and making use of social capital during challenging situations? Methods: We used a mixed-methods social network approach. Twenty-nine junior residents from various specialties participated in qualitative interviews, supplemented by ego (personal) networks to encourage respondents' reflection on social relationship dynamics. Results: Qualitative ego network analysis revealed that residents encounter significant physical and psychological barriers, such as uncertainty and the perceived costs of seeking support, which limit access to crucial information and expertise. Quantitative ego network analysis showed that residents predominantly turned to supervisors, nurses, and peers in challenging situations. However, interviews highlighted the complexity of supervisory relationships, shaped by concerns about career impact. To navigate these barriers emotional support was sought from friends, parents, and close colleagues, while expertise was sought from supervisors, senior residents, and nurses. Conclusion: Residents face significant barriers in mobilizing social capital, particularly with supervisors. To cope, they draw on different parts of their network for emotional support and expertise. Our results suggest that existing help-seeking models, such as Borgatti and Cross's, require refinement: power dynamics contribute to the perceived 'costs' of help-seeking, and uncertainty about others' supportive potential reflects the influence of role ambiguity and relational comfort.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalInternship and ResidencySocial CapitalSocial NetworkingAdultEgoFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID40757090
PMCPMC12315688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.