ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Spontaneous movement therapy for a young adult with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This case study explored the potential of Spontaneous Movement Therapy (SMT)-an active-modified form of Vojta therapy-in improving spinal alignment parameters in a young adult with a history of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). [Participant and Methods] A 21-year-old female with a prior diagnosis of AIS was assessed using full-spine radiographs, which revealed thoracic dextroscoliosis (35.6°) and lumbar levoscoliosis (28.8°). She reported no spinal pain or leg length discrepancy. The patient subsequently underwent an 8-week SMT intervention targeting both coronal and sagittal spinal alignment. [Results] Following the SMT intervention, the thoracic Cobb angle decreased by 4.6° (from 35.6° to 31°), and the angle of trunk rotation (ATR) decreased by 4.0° in the thoracic spine and 3.33° in the lumbar spine. The lumbar Cobb angle remained largely unchanged (28.8° to 29.1°). Although the Cobb angle and ATR were reduced, these changes did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). [Conclusion] Although this case report presents promising preliminary observations, the reductions in spinal curvature parameters did not exceed the MCID, suggesting the need for cautious interpretation. Further studies with larger sample sizes and control groups are warranted to validate the clinical effectiveness of SMT in AIS management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.