ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Comparison of motor performance in typically developing children engaged in gymnastics and classical ballet.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study aimed to compare the motor skills of typically developing children with different movement experiences, specifically classical ballet and gymnastics. [Participants and Methods] The participants included 52 typically developing children aged 4-6 years (25 boys and 27 girls) from Kindergarten. The boys engaged in weekly gymnastics and girls engaged in weekly classical ballet under the guidance of specialized instructors. Motor skills were assessed using the 25-m run, tennis ball throw, double-leg continuous jump, and standing long jump tests incorporated in the motor skills test. Balance ability was evaluated using static standing tests with eyes open and closed on a firm floor and foam rubber pad, each for 30 s. The total locus length and circumferential area were calculated. [Results] The boys demonstrated significantly greater throwing distance in tennis ball throws and superior performance in the standing long jump than girls. In the balance test, girls exhibited greater stability than boys in the static standing with eyes open on firm as well as foam rubber pad conditions, as measured by the total locus length. In addition, girls in the following test conditions had smaller circumferential areas than boys: static standing with eyes open and closed on a firm floor and static standing with eyes closed on a foam rubber pad. [Conclusion] These findings suggest that early childhood motor skills vary according to the type of movement experienced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.