ReviewJornal vascular brasileiro2025
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of diabetes mellitus on chronic venous insufficiency.
Review in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to investigate the occurrence of Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CVI) in patients with Type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). The guiding research question was structured using the PECOT framework (P: population; E: exposure; C: comparison; O: outcome; T: type of study), and the risk of bias was assessed using the ROBIS-I tool. A total of four studies were included in the analysis. The findings revealed that the prevalence of CVI in patients with T2DM was 55%, with a prevalence ratio of 1.51 (95% CI: 1.01 to 2.26). These results suggest that individuals with T2DM have a significantly higher prevalence of CVI compared to those without the condition. However, the review identified several limitations, such as the scarcity of longitudinal studies and variability in the diagnostic criteria for CVI among the included studies. The authors conclude that further research is warranted to address these gaps and deepen understanding of the relationship between T2DM and CVI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.