ReviewJournal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
Effectiveness of orthotic devices in the treatment of forward head posture: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Craniocervical Orthosis Produced Using 3D Printing Technology for Anterior Head Tilt Posture and Thoracic Kyphosis: A Custom-Manufactured Device Pilot Application Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor: Regarding citation in: "Effectiveness of orthotic devices in the treatment of forward head posture: A systematic review".Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forward head posture (FHP), defined as the anterior positioning of the cervical spine where the head protrudes forward in relation to the body's vertical line, has become increasingly common, primarily due to sedentary lifestyles and extensive use of technology, impacting approximately 66% of the population. This condition frequently leads to secondary hyperkyphosis and various musculoskeletal problems, highlighting the urgent need for effective intervention strategies. A systematic review was performed across multiple databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, encompassing studies published until June 2024. The review specifically targeted studies utilizing orthotic devices to address FHP. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, followed by comprehensive data extraction using a standardized form. The review included 10 studies involving a total of 450 patients with FHP. The findings demonstrated that orthotic devices significantly enhance postural parameters, notably improving spinal alignment and reducing FHP. However, the studies also underscored the necessity for better device design to improve comfort and usability for patients. Orthotic devices exhibit considerable potential in improving postural conditions associated with FHP. Future research should concentrate on optimizing device design and examining long-term effectiveness to enhance clinical application and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.