ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025
Rehabilitation of Maxillectomy Patients Using Zygoma Implants.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of the present study was to rehabilitate extensive acquired maxillary defects using zygomatic implant and endosseous dental implant-retained obturator/prosthesis. The objective was to provide a stable, well-retained obturator and to determine the use of zygomatic implants as a reconstructive option to overcome the loss of retentive anatomy following maxillectomy. A total of eight OPD patients - six male and two female of all age groups were selected. Methodology: Scales assessed were: a) Oral Health impact Profile -14 (OHIP-14) and b) Obturator functioning scale (OFS). Parameters recorded preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Clip on denture was delivered to the patient within 7 days with immediate loading concept. Results: The age groups of the patients ranged between 32 and 54 years with mean age of 44.875. The OHIP-14 scores showed significant differences in all domains with conventional obturator/ with implant-retained obturator: mean functional limitation - 4.13 /0.75; mean physical pain - 5.88 / 0.63. The obturator function scores significantly improved from 4.5 to 30.63. Conclusion: Although currently limited, the evidence suggests overall good survival rates for the use of zygomatic implants; however, there are varied institutional results reported, most likely due to differing levels of experience with these techniques which have a distinct learning curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.