ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025
Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone with Marginal Preservation: Esthetic Outcomes in Sites with Thin Buccal Bone Wall.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What is the impact of titanium base versus multi-unit abutments on immediate loading outcomes: a systematic review.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess facial soft tissue levels and buccal bone thickness following immediate implant placement in compromised maxillary anterior sockets using marginal preservation technique. Materials and Methods: A total of 49 patients with failing maxillary anterior teeth were assigned to single immediate implant placement using appropriately sized implants, combined with absorbable collagen matrix membrane and sticky demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft grafting. Definitive crown placement occurred 6 months after provisionalization. The primary outcome was the change in soft tissue levels, assessed using pink esthetic score (PES). Additionally, survival rates and buccal bone thickness were evaluated. Results: The implant survival rate at 6-month follow-up was 100%. After 6 months, the overall PES significantly increased from 6.16 ± 2.23 to 7.31 ± 0.87 ( Conclusion: Immediate implant placement combined with a marginal preservation technique resulted in optimized esthetic outcome and positive changes in buccal bone thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.