ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025
Stress Distribution in Peri-implant Bone of Implants Restored with Screw, Cement, and Cement-Screw Retained Crowns Using Three Crown Materials: a Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To comparatively evaluate stress distribution in the peri-implant bone in three-dimensional finite element (3D FE) models of titanium implants with different crowns-Metal Ceramic, Zirconia, Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) retained by three methods-screw, cement, cement-screw under functional load. Settings and Design: An implant crown can be retained by screw, cement or a combination of the two-cement-screw. Materials for fabricating implant restorations vary which distribute stress differently in the peri-implant bone. Materials and Methods: Nine 3D FE models depicting the restoration-implant-bone complex in the mandibular premolar region were constructed using CAD Solidworks software. The Altair pre-processor was used for model meshing. Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio were allotted to each material. Occlusal loading (100N) in vertical and oblique (30°) directions was performed on the 3D FE models and von Mises stresses generated in the peri-implant bone were visualised, evaluated according to colour code, numerically recorded, assessed and compared. Results: For the vertical and inclined force models, stress distribution in peri-implant bone was higher in all screw retained models and lower for all cement retained and cement-screw retained models. Peri-implant bone stresses were comparable for cement retained and cement-screw retained prosthesis. Conclusion: Any of the nine combinations of crown materials-Metal Ceramic, Zirconia, PEEK and retention methods-screw retained, cement retained, cement-screw retained can be used clinically as they have stress varying for less than 10% across all models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.