ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025
Tomographic Analysis of the Pterygomaxillary Region in Atrophic Maxilla for the Placement of Pterygoid Implants.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Segmentation-Assisted Three-Dimensional Planning Workflow for Static-Guided Pterygoid Implant Placement: A Proof-of-Concept Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine the anatomical and technical parameters for the installation of dental implants in the pterygomaxillary region. Materials and Method: This is a cross-sectional imaging study. Twenty bilateral computed tomography scans (40 regions) were analyzed using the ImplantViewer program and subsequently tabulated in Microsoft Excel for statistical analysis in the GraphPad program with a 95% confidence level. Results: The average implant length ranged from 14 to 18 mm, with an average of 16.2 mm (1.281 right and 16.05 left). The median density in the maxillary tuber region was 169 HU (211.7) (Hounsfield units), and in the pterygoid region, it was 559.55 HU (2.71.7) Conclusion: Pterygoid implants can be a safe and effective alternative for the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws. Tomographic analysis is essential to define the safe installation of implants in the pterygomaxillary region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.