ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2025
Late Breast Cancer Recurrence Prediction: The Role of CTS5 and Progesterone Receptor Status.
Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment of a model to predict the recurrence time of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The current study aimed to assess the recurrence rate in hormone-receptor positive, HER2 negative (HR-positive/HER2-negative) breast cancer patients from a single center in Brazil and compare it with estimates provided by the Clinical Treatment Score post-five years (CTS5). Methods: This study comprised a retrospective analysis of patients from a national cancer center database, which began treatment between 2007 and 2008 and had no evidence of recurrence after five years of follow-up. All patients had confirmed diagnosis of HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer. Disease Free-Survival (DFS) according to each CTS5 risk subgroup was the main outcome. Results: A total of 162 patients were enrolled, 26.5% being premenopausal. The mean age at diagnosis was 60.1 years (49.8─71.6). Tumor stage: I (43.8%) and II (56.2%). Endocrine therapy consisted mainly of tamoxifen (88.0%). About 39.5%, 39.5%, and 21.0% of patients were in the low, intermediate, and high-risk (L/I/H) subgroups according to CTS5, respectively. Progesterone-receptor (PR) was ≥20% in 71.0% of tumors and 77.0%, 69.0%, and 65.0% in the L/I/H subgroups, respectively. The median follow-up was 88.9 months. DFS at 5 years (10 years since the beginning of endocrine therapy) was 100%, 96.3% (95% CI, 89.4%─100%) and 68.2% (95% CI, 48.7%─95.5%) in the L/I/H subgroups, respectively. PR was an independent prognostic factor for late recurrence in intermediate- (p=0.022) and high-risk (p=0.003) subgroup patients according to CTS5. Conclusion: CTS5 performed well in the high-risk subset of patients from a wider population, including premenopausal women. The progesterone receptor was an independent prognostic factor for DFS in intermediate- and high-risk populations and should be further investigated in prospective multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.