ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2025
Protecting children in Aotearoa New Zealand: a review on legal and professional frameworks for oral health practitioners.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child asserts that all children have the right to protection from abuse and exploitation. In Aotearoa New Zealand, the prevalence of child maltreatment requires vigilant action from oral health practitioners (OHPs), who are often among the first in the position to recognise signs of abuse and neglect due to their frequent interactions with children in dental settings. The Dental Council of New Zealand sets professional requirements, highlighting practitioners' roles in responding to potential signs of maltreatment. Multiple statutes, including the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989 and the Family Violence Act 2018, govern OHPs' responses. Despite this, there is a notable gap in OHPs' confidence and understanding of their child protection roles, underlining the need for clear guidance on the legal and professional requirements that inform their responsibilities. This paper critically examines the professional responsibilities and policies governing OHPs in Aotearoa New Zealand regarding child protection responses. It also proposes the development of equity-focused guidelines, that are informed by Te Tiriti o Waitangi, emphasising culturally responsive practices, collaborations with Māori health providers and clear protocols for child protection responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.