Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756886›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2025

Giving voice to Ngā Taketake a Tāne: a review of contemporary, traditional and indigenous pharmacopoeias, and implications for Te Tauihu in Aotearoa-New Zealand.

Charles Eason, Pā Robert McGowan, Aroha Mead, Meika Foster, Donna Kerridge, Miriana Stephens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charles EasonAuOra Ltd, Wakatū Incorporation, Nelson, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9069-0639
Pā Robert McGowanAuOra Ltd, Wakatū Incorporation, Nelson, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2301-2883
Aroha MeadAuOra Ltd, Wakatū Incorporation, Nelson, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6280-9441
Meika FosterAuOra Ltd, Wakatū Incorporation, Nelson, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3828-0840
Donna KerridgeAuOra Ltd, Wakatū Incorporation, Nelson, New Zealand.
Miriana StephensAuOra Ltd, Wakatū Incorporation, Nelson, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review compares contemporary with traditional medicine and indigenous pharmacopoeias. A new approach for an indigenous pharmacopoeia is explored. Kaitiakitanga and conservation of medicinal plants, as well as sustaining and strengthening rongoā Māori and improving health outcomes through developing Te Tauihu Pharmacopoeia is an aspiration. Valuing medicinal plants as taonga and acknowledging traditional understanding along with guiding tikanga, including respect, humility, honesty, transparency and permission from knowledge holders, are prerequisites for such an initiative. Pharmacopoeias have traditionally described the making of healing medicines. Hundreds of these have been compiled, some dating back prior to 1,000 AD, notably the Chinese Pharmacopoeia in 250 AD. Despite a drive for standardisation, there are different styles including regional and indigenous pharmacopoeias, arising from different rationales for their development. In Aotearoa-New Zealand there are no current pharmacopoeias; historical and recent laws and policies have either impeded or fallen short of the commitment made by other countries to traditional medicines. Reversing the erosion of traditional knowledge resulting from colonisation is an important driver for written versions of indigenous verbal pharmacopoeias, but a new pharmacopoeia based on verbal traditions, historical information, and mātauranga Māori cannot be pursued lightly, and should be led by indigenous knowledge holders.

Indexed as

Kaitiakitangamātauranga Māoripharmacopoeiarongoā Māoritikangatraditional medicines

Identifiers

PMID40756886
PMCPMC12315165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.