Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756853›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2025

The Kaitiaki Intelligence Platform: conceptual foundations for an indigenous environmental sensing network.

John Reid, Matthew Rout, Desna Whaanga Schollum, Corey Ruha, Jan Hania

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. From data to decisions: Toward a Biodiversity Monitoring Standards Framework.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John ReidNgāi Tahu Research Centre, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2657-593X
Matthew RoutNgāi Tahu Research Centre, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9969-3884
Desna Whaanga SchollumDWS Creative Limited, Poukawa, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0772-0081
Corey RuhaTe Arawa Lakes Trust, Rotorua, New Zealand.
Jan HaniaOpepe Farm Trust, Taupo, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Māori agribusiness collectives (MACs) and iwi (tribal entities) in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ) are increasingly focused on enhancing their environmental intelligence capabilities. With advancements in environmental sensing technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), and data warehousing, it has become feasible for MACs and iwi to establish their own environmental sensor networks (ESNs). In response to this interest, the Kaitiaki Intelligence Platform project was launched to design an Indigenous ESN. This paper examines the types of environmental data that MAC and iwi partners aim to capture with an ESN, as well as their preferences for data structure, querying, and communication. The findings indicate that these partners seek to collect a wide range of biophysical data using both remote and in-situ sensing technologies, combined with Place-based intelligence informed by mātauranga (Māori knowledge/knowledge system). They prefer to structure data using Māori environmental ontologies and apply mātauranga to train AI systems that can identify environmental health indicators and model the balance between human and non-human environmental persons. Data communication is favoured through relational kin-centric metaphors, reflecting a culturally sensitive approach to environmental monitoring. Furthermore, the need for layered data security is emphasised to uphold Indigenous data sovereignty principles.

Indexed as

Aotearoa New Zealanddata sovereigntyEnvironmental sensing network technologiesindigenous knowledgeMātauranga Māori

Identifiers

PMID40756853
PMCPMC12315128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.