ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2025
Examining the efforts of the Biological Heritage National Science Challenge Ngā Koiora Tuku Iho to improve equity and diversity in the research system.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leading with courage and integrity in the National Science Challenges.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Article
- Examining the efforts of the Biological Heritage National Science Challenge Ngā Koiora Tuku Iho to improve equity and diversity in the research system.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aotearoa-New Zealand's research community has been shifting towards more societally-engaged and responsible approaches to better address complex socio-ecological challenges like biodiversity loss. Such approaches to research benefit from workforces diverse in career stage, disciplinary background, age, gender, ethnicity and worldview. Yet exclusionary practices and processes, including disciplinary and epistemic hierarchies which devalue the 'soft' sciences and Indigenous knowledges, continue to undermine transformative system change. While these systemic inequities are well documented, less attention has been given to examining efforts that address such inequities. Over a ten-year period, New Zealand's Biological Heritage National Science Challenge (BioHeritage) made a conscious effort to support the flourishing of diverse ways of doing, knowing and being in the research system. In this paper, we use reporting data, and an online survey conducted in 2021, to assess the initial outcomes of this approach. We find that BioHeritage's conscious efforts to support early career, female, and Māori leadership, disciplinary diversity, and mātauranga Māori have meaningfully impacted the diversity and inclusiveness of BioHeritage's workforce. We also reiterate the importance of engaging carefully and reflexively with systemic challenges in ongoing efforts to foster diverse and inclusive research spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.