Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756834›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2025

Examining the efforts of the Biological Heritage National Science Challenge Ngā Koiora Tuku Iho to improve equity and diversity in the research system.

Susanna Finlay-Smits, Aisling Rayne, Symon Palmer, Kathryn M McRae, Helen J Warburton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Leading with courage and integrity in the National Science Challenges.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susanna Finlay-SmitsManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6331-9284
Aisling RayneCawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9234-4825
Symon PalmerTe Herenga Waka, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6519-4385
Kathryn M McRaeAgResearch Ltd., Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4229-9341
Helen J WarburtonTe Whare Wānanga o Waitaha, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6828-2532

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aotearoa-New Zealand's research community has been shifting towards more societally-engaged and responsible approaches to better address complex socio-ecological challenges like biodiversity loss. Such approaches to research benefit from workforces diverse in career stage, disciplinary background, age, gender, ethnicity and worldview. Yet exclusionary practices and processes, including disciplinary and epistemic hierarchies which devalue the 'soft' sciences and Indigenous knowledges, continue to undermine transformative system change. While these systemic inequities are well documented, less attention has been given to examining efforts that address such inequities. Over a ten-year period, New Zealand's Biological Heritage National Science Challenge (BioHeritage) made a conscious effort to support the flourishing of diverse ways of doing, knowing and being in the research system. In this paper, we use reporting data, and an online survey conducted in 2021, to assess the initial outcomes of this approach. We find that BioHeritage's conscious efforts to support early career, female, and Māori leadership, disciplinary diversity, and mātauranga Māori have meaningfully impacted the diversity and inclusiveness of BioHeritage's workforce. We also reiterate the importance of engaging carefully and reflexively with systemic challenges in ongoing efforts to foster diverse and inclusive research spaces.

Indexed as

Aotearoa New Zealandequitymission-ledNational Science ChallengeResearch systemsurvey

Identifiers

PMID40756834
PMCPMC12315135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.