Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756815›Full record

ArticleHRB open research2025

Exploring diabetic foot screening programs with integrated consolidated framework for implementation: Rapid review protocol.

Virginie Blanchette, Maya Fakhfakh, Yassin Andoulsi, Magali Brousseau-Foley, Jennifer A Pallin, Claire Buckley, Laura M Drudi, Charles de Mestral, Janet L Kuhnke, Caroline McIntosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HRB open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Virginie BlanchetteDepartment of Human Kinetics and Podiatric Medicine, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivières, Québec, G8Z 4M3, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5901-8964
Maya FakhfakhDepartment of Human Kinetics and Podiatric Medicine, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivières, Québec, G8Z 4M3, Canada.
Yassin AndoulsiDepartment of Human Kinetics and Podiatric Medicine, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivières, Québec, G8Z 4M3, Canada.
Magali Brousseau-FoleyDepartment of Human Kinetics and Podiatric Medicine, University of Quebec at Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivières, Québec, G8Z 4M3, Canada.
Jennifer A PallinSchool of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dubblin, D02 YN77, Ireland.
Claire BuckleySchool of Public Health, University of Cork, Cork, Cork county, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3174-7022
Laura M DrudiUniversity of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Charles de MestralDepartment of surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Janet L KuhnkeSchool of Nursing,, Cape Breton University, Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Caroline McIntoshDiscipline of Podiatric Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, County Galway, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU)s pose significant challenges for individuals with diabetes, leading to severe consequences, such as lower extremity amputations (LEA)s, reduced quality of life, and increased mortality. Disorganized diabetic foot care services contribute to health inequities worldwide, highlighting the need for structured preventive measures, which require an understanding of organizational and systemic components of the implementation of foot screening programs or initiatives, including equity factors. Thus, the Methods: A rapid review will be conducted following the Canadian method by Dobbins (2017) and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol guidelines. The research question is defined using the PICO framework. A systematic search will be conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE. Primary studies in English or French, including both primary study designs and knowledge syntheses, will be screened according to the defined eligibility criteria via Covidence. Study quality will be appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and data will be synthesized guided by the CFIR. Data synthesis will focus on implementation determinants, including barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies. Discussion: Findings will inform policy, practice and decision making regarding the implementation of screening programs. This can promote the development of screening programs for diabetic foot complications across Canada or in other countries.

Indexed as

Foot ulcer; Diabetic Foot; Prevention and Control; Implementation Science; Primary Health Care; Diagnostic Screening Programs

Identifiers

PMID40756815
PMCPMC12314480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.