Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756801›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025

How Downhill and Uphill Running Interfere Posture and Muscle Activity: A Descriptive Laboratory Study.

Nadine Engeler, Eric Lichtenstein, Oliver Faude, Ralf Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadine EngelerDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health University of Basel.
Eric LichtensteinDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health University of Basel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5860-9068
Oliver FaudeDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health University of Basel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2832-7780
Ralf RothDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health University of Basel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3029-6004

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Downhill and uphill running alter running kinematics, changing force distributions and muscle activities. While changes in the lower limbs have received more attention, research on the back and pelvis remains scarce. Understanding grade-specific changes in the trunk is crucial for developing injury prevention strategies and return-to-activity protocols after back injuries. Purpose: This study examined how running on six different gradients (ranging from -15% downhill to +15% uphill) affects back and pelvic posture, as well as muscle activity in trunk and lower limb muscles. Methods: Twelve healthy recreational runners (6 women, 6 men) participated in a descriptive laboratory study. Kinematic variables (lumbar lordosis, hip drop, pelvic tilt, and trunk inclination) were assessed via 3D motion capture. Surface electromyography recorded muscle activity, normalized to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), in selected trunk and lower limb muscles, including the medial gastrocnemius, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, vastus lateralis, rectus abdominis, external oblique, and erector spinae. A linear mixed-effects model with random intercepts was used to compare each gradient to level running. Cohen's d was calculated to quantify effect sizes. Results: Compared to level running lumbar lordosis was increased at -15% (mean difference [MD]: 1.2 ± 4.9 degrees, Cohen's d = 0.73, p-value = 0.007) and decreased at +15% (MD: -1 ± 3.6 degrees, d = 0.39, p = 0.290). Total hip drop decreased at -15% (MD: 14.2 ± 11 mm, d = 1.93, p < 0.001). Muscular activity of certain lower limb muscles was higher at steep downhill and uphill gradients. While the abdominals showed no consistent changes across gradients, activity of erector spinae was reduced at -10% and -5%. Conclusion: Downhill running increases lumbar lordosis, potentially elevating the risk of lumbar spine overload. When attempting to prevent and rehabilitate lower back injuries, a progression starting with uphill, followed by level and lastly by downhill running, may be advisable. Gradient-specific training should be considered due to the distinct neuromuscular demands across inclines. Level of Evidence: 3b.

Indexed as

biomechanicselectromyographyhip droplumbar lordosispelvic tiltrunning gait kinematicsspinetreadmilltrunk inclination

Identifiers

PMID40756801
PMCPMC12317792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.