ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025
How Downhill and Uphill Running Interfere Posture and Muscle Activity: A Descriptive Laboratory Study.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Alterations in pelvic kinematics with speed, incline, and fatigue in female runners.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Downhill and uphill running alter running kinematics, changing force distributions and muscle activities. While changes in the lower limbs have received more attention, research on the back and pelvis remains scarce. Understanding grade-specific changes in the trunk is crucial for developing injury prevention strategies and return-to-activity protocols after back injuries. Purpose: This study examined how running on six different gradients (ranging from -15% downhill to +15% uphill) affects back and pelvic posture, as well as muscle activity in trunk and lower limb muscles. Methods: Twelve healthy recreational runners (6 women, 6 men) participated in a descriptive laboratory study. Kinematic variables (lumbar lordosis, hip drop, pelvic tilt, and trunk inclination) were assessed via 3D motion capture. Surface electromyography recorded muscle activity, normalized to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), in selected trunk and lower limb muscles, including the medial gastrocnemius, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, vastus lateralis, rectus abdominis, external oblique, and erector spinae. A linear mixed-effects model with random intercepts was used to compare each gradient to level running. Cohen's d was calculated to quantify effect sizes. Results: Compared to level running lumbar lordosis was increased at -15% (mean difference [MD]: 1.2 ± 4.9 degrees, Cohen's d = 0.73, p-value = 0.007) and decreased at +15% (MD: -1 ± 3.6 degrees, d = 0.39, p = 0.290). Total hip drop decreased at -15% (MD: 14.2 ± 11 mm, d = 1.93, p < 0.001). Muscular activity of certain lower limb muscles was higher at steep downhill and uphill gradients. While the abdominals showed no consistent changes across gradients, activity of erector spinae was reduced at -10% and -5%. Conclusion: Downhill running increases lumbar lordosis, potentially elevating the risk of lumbar spine overload. When attempting to prevent and rehabilitate lower back injuries, a progression starting with uphill, followed by level and lastly by downhill running, may be advisable. Gradient-specific training should be considered due to the distinct neuromuscular demands across inclines. Level of Evidence: 3b.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.