ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Executive dysfunctions in patients with low-grade gliomas in the supplementary motor area: a neuropsychological perspective.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Altered regional spontaneous brain activity in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
- Left Pulvinar Thalamic Tumor with Ventricular Atrial Extension Presenting as Network-Level Cognitive and Gait Dysfunction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Associations among structural brain alterations, respiratory symptoms and cognitive impairment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-related subclinical cognitive vulnerability: a multimodal neuroimaging study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The supplementary motor area (SMA) is one of the more common locations where low-grade gliomas (LGG) are found. It is an area that, in addition to controlling movement, is also involved in a range of cognitive functions, including executive functions, but data on this topic is still scarce. The aim of this study was a comprehensive assessment of executive functions, as well as an evaluation of clinical variables that may influence the obtained results. Materials and methods: The study included 23 patients with LGG tumors located in the SMA and a control group of 57 healthy individuals. They were all tested using a set of neuropsychological tests: the Stroop Test, the Verbal Fluency Test, the Tower of London Test, and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Results: The conducted analyses revealed the presence of significant differences between groups in terms of selected indicators of each test. Furthermore, the results of individual TOL and WCST indicators showed significant correlations with the tumor volume. The comparison of patients with tumors in the left and right hemispheres revealed differences solely in WCST performance, with those having left SMA damage performing worse. There were also differences in the performance of the WCST test to the disadvantage of patients who had epileptic seizures compared to those who did not. Moreover, patients with oligodendrogliomas scored lower than those with astrocytomas on some of the WCST indices. Conclusions: Patients with LGG tumors in the supplementary motor area present a wide range of executive dysfunctions, including planning, reasoning, inhibition, switching, and cognitive flexibility. Both the volume and type of tumor, the hemisphere in which it is located and the occurrence of epileptic seizures may be related to the results. Future studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.