Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756762›Full record

ArticleEconomy and society2025

From jurisdiction to veridiction: Expertise and economization of immunization policy in the United States.

Dmitrii M Zhikharevich, Katharina T Paul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Economy and society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dmitrii M ZhikharevichDmitrii M. Zhikharevich Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Kolingasse 14-16, 1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: dmitrii.zhikharevich@univie.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2518-7858
Katharina T PaulKatharina T. Paul (corresponding author), Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Kolingasse 14-16, 1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: katharina.t.paul@univie.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3851-8951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Economic valuations play an increasingly important role in contemporary vaccination governance. Focusing on the United States, this paper presents a genealogy of economization in immunization policy. Borrowing from Foucault, it argues that economization occurs in two distinct modalities: juridical and veridical. In the former case, economization serves the purpose of 'doing justice' to an issue or practice. In the latter case, it asks what must be true about the world for an issue or practice to be justified. Drawing on published, archival and oral history sources, we show how immunizations in the United States first became economized in a juridical modality in the 1960s. We then trace their veridical turn in the 1970s by looking at the traffic of ideas and individuals between the Centers for Disease Control and the Harvard School of Public Health.

Indexed as

cost–benefit analysiseconomizationexpertiseFoucaultpublic healthvaccination

Identifiers

PMID40756762
PMCPMC12315836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.