Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756701›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025

Validation of the NOSE-Perf Scale for Nasal Septal Perforation: A Cross-Cultural Study With a Nasal Obstruction Comparator.

Kyung Won Kwon, Mi Hyeon Jin, Nak Gyeong Ko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond structural defect: quality of life impact of nasal septal perforation in adults - a scoping review of validated patient-reported outcome measures.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kyung Won KwonDepartment of Otolaryngology Samsung Changwon Hospital, University of Sungkyunkwan, College of Medicine Changwon Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0633-8374
Mi Hyeon JinDepartment of Research & Support Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Changwon Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6436-2196
Nak Gyeong KoDepartment of Research & Support Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Changwon Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4468-9589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Nasal septal perforation (NSP) presents complex diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, particularly due to the absence of a validated, symptom-specific patient-reported outcome measure. The nasal obstruction symptom evaluation-perforation (NOSE-Perf) scale was recently developed to address this gap. This study aimed to cross-culturally validate the Korean version of the NOSE-Perf scale and evaluate its clinical utility in distinguishing NSP-related symptoms. Methods: The 12-item NOSE-Perf scale, which includes five NOSE items and seven additional, non-obstruction-related questions, was translated into Korean. Thirty-six patients with NSP, 40 with nasal obstruction only, and 40 control patients with no rhinologic symptoms completed the questionnaire. The scale's internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity were evaluated. Results: The most commonly reported symptoms on the NOSE-Perf scale among patients with NSP were nasal congestion and obstruction (32/36 for each), followed by nasal crusting and difficulty breathing through the nose. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's Conclusion: The Korean version of the NOSE-Perf scale is a valid and reliable assessment tool for NSP in Korean patients, facilitating more accurate diagnosis and treatment evaluation compared with the NOSE scale. Level of Evidence: Not applicable.

Indexed as

nasal obstructionnasal septal perforationNOSE‐Perf scalesymptom assessmentvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID40756701
PMCPMC12317365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.