ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescriptions Written for Dental Prophylaxis Within a Regional Veterans Affairs Healthcare System Based on American Dental Association and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Guidance.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Charting new territory: outpatient stewardship in immunocompromised patients (first of a two-part series).Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Review
- Antibiotics in dental practice: Global implications, clinical realities and the path towards stewardship.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We determined the prevalence of inappropriate dental prophylaxis antibiotic prescriptions written by providers within a Veterans Integrated Service Network based on American Dental Association (ADA) and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidance. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of antibiotic prescriptions written for dental prophylaxis from 1 May 2023 through 30 April 2024. Prescriptions were defined as indicated if the patient met ADA guidance criteria. A subset of prescriptions written for patients with orthopedic implants was assessed for appropriateness when applying the 2017 and 2024 AAOS guidelines. Results: Of 622 prescriptions, 53%, 37%, and 10% were written due to underlying orthopedic, cardiac, and other conditions, respectively. Dentists prescribed 51% of prescriptions, followed by primary care providers (35%) and orthopedic specialists (9%). Overall, 67% prescriptions were not indicated. When considering indication, agent, and dose, 72% of prescriptions were inappropriate. Prescriptions written due to cardiac conditions were more likely to be indicated than prescriptions written due to orthopedic conditions ( Conclusions: Our results suggest substantial antibiotic overuse and lack of adherence with ADA and AAOS recommendations, particularly among patients with orthopedic implants. These results highlight the need for multifaceted stewardship interventions targeting not only dentists, but all types of providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.