Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756649›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Responding to Emerging Epidemics: Insights From Stakeholders on Mpox Vaccine Rollout in Philadelphia.

Aaron Richterman, Caroline O'brien, Fatemeh Ghadimi, Elijah Sumners, Andre Ford, Nafisah Houston, Sebrina Tate, Nancy Aitcheson, Hervette Nkwihoreze, John B Jemmott and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aaron RichtermanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7920-7191
Caroline O'brienMixed Methods Research Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fatemeh GhadimiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3089-7459
Elijah SumnersThe COLOURS Organization, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Andre FordThe COLOURS Organization, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nafisah HoustonBebashi-Transition to Hope, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6985-6871
Sebrina TateBebashi-Transition to Hope, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nancy AitchesonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3592-1905
Hervette NkwihorezeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
John B JemmottAnnenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Florence MomplaisirDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Virus & Reservoirs CoreP30AI045008 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Ronald G Collman · 1999 to 2026
$78.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI045008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The 2022 mpox outbreak serves as an important example of a rapidly emerging epidemic that disproportionately affected marginalized populations. Despite the availability of a preventive vaccine, its deployment ultimately fell short of reaching the populations at greatest risk. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the vaccination campaign from the perspectives of key stakeholders. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews to assess knowledge and perceptions of mpox, as well as barriers and facilitators to vaccine uptake in Philadelphia. We recruited health care clients and community members who were eligible for mpox vaccination and health care workers and community-based organization staff involved in vaccination efforts. We used purposeful selection to ensure inclusion of people with HIV. We used an integrated analysis approach that combined modified grounded theory and implementation science constructs. Results: We interviewed 21 health care clients, 9 community members, 10 health care workers, and 3 community-based organization staff after the primary mpox response in 2022 between February 2023 and October 2024. Participants varied in their knowledge and perceptions of mpox risk, primarily varying based on the perceived importance of sexual identity vs sexual behaviors. They generally believed that at-risk individuals should be vaccinated. Participants reported trusting mpox information from sources they trusted for other health information, such as health departments or knowledgeable members of social networks. Most participants expressed concern about inequitable distribution of the vaccine. Commonly reported facilitators to vaccination included one's own risk perception, technological literacy, co-locating vaccinations with existing clinical and social spaces, and outreach through trusted health-, community-, and social network-based resources. Knowledge, administrative (eg, difficulty signing up), and logistical (eg, limited clinic hours) barriers to vaccine access were thought to exacerbate inequities. Conclusions: While an effective mpox vaccine was a key asset in the response, barriers related to availability, accessibility, awareness, and logistical constraints limited its reach to those at highest risk.

Indexed as

mpoxqualitative researchsexually transmitted infectionsvaccines

Identifiers

PMID40756649
PMCPMC12314358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.