ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Research advances in the etiology of in-stent restenosis of coronary arteries.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between stent length and number and the risk of in-stent restenosis in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Development of a Risk Stratification Model for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Based on Clinical, Laboratory, and Procedural Factors: A Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Inflammatory Prognostic Index: A Novel Predictor of In-Stent Restenosis Following Drug-Eluting Stent-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring the relationship between novel serum inflammatory markers, non-traditional lipid parameters, and in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Association between the composite nutritional index TCBI and ISR.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- The impact of stenting on hemodynamic environment of tortuous coronary artery: results derived from a numerical simulation model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article conducts a systematic literature analysis, focusing on exploring the etiological factors of coronary in-stent restenosis(ISR). It is found that the occurrence of ISR is influenced by a variety of factors, including patient-related biological factors (such as diabetes and smoking), lesion anatomical factors (such as calcification and lesion length), and factors related to the surgical procedure (such as incomplete stent expansion and stent malposition). Regarding the prevention of coronary in-stent restenosis, individualized treatment strategies need to be developed by combining patient characteristics, lesion anatomy, and surgical techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.