ArticleCase reports in obstetrics and gynecology2025
Hysteroscopic Confirmation of a Uterine Arteriovenous Malformation as a Possible Cause of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.
Article in Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report highlights the cornerstone role played by hysteroscopy to confirm a diagnosis of uterine arteriovenous malformations that was ambiguous with the imaging studies. A 30-year-old nulliparous woman who experienced three unexplained recurrent pregnancy losses was suspected of having a uterine arteriovenous malformation. The arteriovenous malformation was confirmed through hysteroscopy and managed with a multidisciplinary approach involving interventional radiology and reproductive specialists. The hysteroscopy was followed by uterine artery embolization, which resulted in the resolution of the arteriovenous malformation. A spontaneous pregnancy and live birth rapidly followed. Uterine arteriovenous malformations have been widely reported in gynecology as a consequence of the surgical treatment of a miscarriage or gestational trophoblastic disease. We suggest that they are also important to diagnose in patients presenting with recurrent pregnancy loss, where they represent a curable etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.