ArticlePaediatrics & child health2025
Evaluation of an educational video assessing knowledge and attitudes of transgender youth on fertility preservation.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: While gender-affirming therapy can alleviate gender dysphoria in transgender individuals, such treatments may negatively impact fertility. As such, multiple organizations have highlighted the importance of counselling and offering fertility preservation (FP) prior to the initiation of medical therapy. To supplement fertility discussions, whiteboard educational videos were created to review and provide information on FP for transgender and non-binary youths and their families. This study assessed the understandability, actionability, and readability of the FP educational videos; patient perceptions, knowledge, barriers, and interest in FP; and overall satisfaction with the videos. Methods: Participants (age 12 to 18) completed an online survey assessing their knowledge, perceptions, and overall thoughts on FP prior to watching a short educational video on FP. They were then invited to complete the survey again after watching the educational video and provide feedback on the video presented. Results: Twenty-one participants were enrolled in the study. Seventeen participants completed the pre-video survey, and 12 completed the post-video and video feedback survey (completion rate of 81.0% and 57.1%, respectively). The mean age of participants was 15.50 (SD = 1.34). In the pre-video survey, one participant (1/15; 6.7%) rated their knowledge of FP as 'very good' or 'good' (1/15; 6.7%) compared to 10 participants (10/12; 83.3%) in the post-video survey (P = 0.039). Feedback regarding the videos was overwhelmingly positive. Conclusions: Our results suggest that targeted patient education aids, such as a whiteboard educational video on FP, can be used to supplement fertility discussions with gender-diverse youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.