ArticlePaediatrics & child health2025
Improving paediatric clinical teaching unit handover: A quality improvement project.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Handover is an integral part of patient care and is dependent on effective communication between physicians. Poor quality handover can lead to patient harm, with up to 75% of patients in whom there are handover failures sustaining preventable adverse events. Paediatric Clinical Teaching Unit (CTU) Morbidity and Mortality rounds identified multiple handover-related adverse events. We therefore undertook a quality improvement project to reduce handover-related adverse events and improve participant satisfaction with handover. Methods: This project was carried out in two phases at an academic tertiary care paediatric hospital in London, Ontario. Phase I involved recording any adverse events that occurred overnight. A root cause analysis with paediatric residents identified the key contributors to poor handover. Phase II implemented strategies aimed at addressing these contributors. CTU handovers were then observed using the same questionnaires as Phase I. Following Phase II, a questionnaire was sent to all paediatric residents to evaluate their perceived changes in handover. Interventions: Designating a handover room, collaborating with nurses to reduce pages during handover, changing pager messages to minimize non-emergent pages during handover, creating a handover template, and providing formal teaching to medical students and residents. Results: Implementation of the interventions resulted in a significant decrease in interruptions and background noise. There was a trend toward a reduction in adverse events from 13 in Phase I to 7 in Phase II. All residents felt that handover improved, with 16.7% stating minimal improvement, 61.1% stating some improvement, and 22.2% stating good improvement. Conclusions: Results show that the simple strategies implemented improved resident handover.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.