ArticlePaediatrics & child health2025
HEADS-ED Under 6: A clinician-administered mental health and developmental screening and triage tool.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Equity and access to a regional child and youth mental health and addiction navigation service: a secondary analysis study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Development of an infant and early childhood mental health service at a tertiary care pediatric hospital: a needs assessment, community case study and logic model creation.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Communimetric screening tools convey functional impairment and action required, helping clinicians identify and communicate patient's needs and actions within a measurement framework. We examined the feasibility of using the HEADS-ED Under 6, a communimetric mental health (MH) and developmental screening and triage tool for children under 6, within 1Call1Click.ca, a regional coordinated access and navigation program in Eastern Ontario. We explored utility validity to understand how the HEADS-ED Under 6 is used to help intake workers screen, inform their level of need decision, and establish a cut-off for recommending interventions targeting moderate levels of need or higher. Methods: Using a prospective cohort design, intake workers at 1Call1Click.ca screened all children under 6 using the HEADS-ED Under 6 from June 2021 to August 2023. Correlations and an Analysis of variance examined how total scores were associated with the level of need, and Receiver Operator Curve analysis examined sensitivity and specificity for identifying moderate levels of need or higher. Results: In total, 589 children under 6 were screened with the HEADS-ED Under 6. Utility validity was demonstrated by significant associations between level of need and HEADS-ED Under 6 domains and total scores. A total score of ≥6 supported decision-making for moderate levels of need or higher (Area Under Curve = 0.807). Conclusions: The HEADS-ED Under 6 is a brief, easy, and valid screening tool, that can be used by clinicians to identify the level of action/impairment, communicate the severity of MH and developmental needs, and determine the level of need for services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.