Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756488›Full record

ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine

Morphometric analysis of some important parameters for the transoral approach to the occipito-atlanto-axial region: MDCT study.

Musa Acar, Serdar Karaköse, Elif Iyiduran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Musa AcarDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nezahat Keleşoğlu Health Sciences, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Serdar KaraköseDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Elif IyiduranDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Transoral approach is a frequently preferred method for the craniocervical region. Interventions in this area are performed for decompression purposes or to provide craniocervical fixation. To get a good result, knowing the anatomy of the region in detail will make the entrepreneur's job much easier. Aims: The aim of the study is to contribute to the surgeons' perspective during the intervention by creating reference values in transoral approaches to the cervical region. Settings and Design: This study is a retrospective descriptive file screening study. Methods: The study was performed using cranial computed tomography images of 200 patients. These patients consisted of 100 men and 100 women. The age range of the individuals included in the study varies between 20 and 80. In our study, the parameters measured and recorded in the coronal, sagittal, and axial plane. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS 22 was used for statistical analysis. Results: In our study, seven different parameters were measured and recorded. Our results were evaluated between genders and in terms of lateralization. The obtained averages were tested statistically. Conclusions: To plan and conclude a successful surgical intervention, it is necessary to have a good command of the area to be operated on. The data we present in our study will help surgeons dealing with the region in this sense. In addition, our study will contribute to the creation of a database on healthy individuals in Turkish society.

Indexed as

Anatomycomputed tomographycraniofacialscrewingsurgeryvertebra

Identifiers

PMID40756488
PMCPMC12313041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.