ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Teriparatide use is associated with increased odds of 2-year implant failure and revision in osteopenic patients undergoing cervical fusion.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative teriparatide in adult spinal deformity: a retrospective comparative cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Assessment of Teriparatide's Effect on Post-operative Functional Outcome and Fracture Healing.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Cervical fusion outcomes are influenced by bone quality, with osteopenia increasing the risk of implant failure and revision surgery. The impact of teriparatide in this population remains unclear. Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between teriparatide use and 90-day medical complications, 2-year surgical complications, and hospital readmissions in this population. Settings and Design: A retrospective cohort analysis using the PearlDiver Mariner database from 2010 to 2022. Subjects and Methods: Patients undergoing cervical fusion were stratified by teriparatide use. Propensity score matching (1:5) was performed based on age, gender, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, obesity, and bisphosphonate use. Primary outcomes included 90-day medical complications, 2-year surgical complications, surgical revisions, and hospital readmissions. Statistical Analysis Used: Logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with a Bonferroni-corrected significance level of Results: Ninety-eight teriparatide-treated patients were matched to 487 controls. Teriparatide use was significantly associated with higher rates of 2-year implant failure (4.1% vs. 1.0%, Conclusions: Teriparatide use in osteopenic patients undergoing cervical fusion is associated with increased risks of 2-year implant failure and surgical revisions. These findings suggest that while teriparatide improves bone quality, its efficacy may be limited in this population. Future research should explore tailored interventions to optimize surgical outcomes in osteopenic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.