Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756467›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Nursing Students' Use of Digital Resources for Self-Directed Learning in Bioscience.

Victoria Oppegaard Berre, Unni Knutstad, Kari Toverud Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Victoria Oppegaard BerreFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5583-1256
Unni KnutstadFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2162-7959
Kari Toverud JensenFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6084-2638

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: First year nursing students often find bioscience challenging to learn and understand, leading many students to seek additional support through digital resources. Previous research highlights students' preference for flexible digital resources such as educational videos. However, researchers seem to raise critical reflections on the pedagogical value of digital resources, particularly how they can support, enhance or improve learning. Self-directed learning is essential in higher education and particularly important in health professional education as it entails lifelong learning, crucial to ensure safe and efficient patient care. Employing the cognitive theory of multimedia learning, this study offers insights into how digital resources may support self-directed learning in bioscience among first year nursing students. Objective: To explore how digital resources can support self-directed learning among first year nursing students in bioscience. In this study, the term "digital resources" encompasses students' use of online platforms that offer educational videos, interactive exercises and personalized feedback, and their use of internet searches. Framed within the concept of self-directed learning, the researchers explore how students engage with such digital resources outside of formal teaching settings. Method: A qualitative method with semi-structured individual interviews was employed. The data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis, with NVivo being used to organize the data into codes and themes. COREQ was applied as the reporting checklist. Results: Two main themes were identified: 'Digital resources provide an overview over bioscience', and 'Motivational issues - deep learning or passing the exam'. Conclusion: Digital resources can support self-directed learning by guiding students in selecting content and providing a sense of control over the learning process.

Indexed as

anatomydigitaleducationlearningmultimediaNursephysiology

Identifiers

PMID40756467
PMCPMC12314246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.