Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756430›Full record

ArticleImmuno-oncology technology2025

Properties of CD8 T-cell-recognized neoantigens in different tumor types.

S L C Ketelaars, M M van Buuren, A Gangaev, N van Rooij, S Patiwael, K Hoefakker, L F Fanchi, P Baas, M van der Heijden, M Kok and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immuno-oncology technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

S L C KetelaarsDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M M van BuurenDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A GangaevDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
N van RooijDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S PatiwaelDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
K HoefakkerDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L F FanchiDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P BaasDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M van der HeijdenDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M KokDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T N SchumacherDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P KvistborgDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J B A G HaanenDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neoantigen-based immunotherapies rely on computational tools predicting peptide immunogenicity based on properties such as its expression level, binding affinity to human leukocyte antigen (HLA), likelihood of proteasomal cleavage and dissimilarity from wild-type peptide. However, current datasets are scarce and limited to highly mutated tumor types such as melanoma and lung cancer, leaving uncertainty about the value of these properties in other tumor types. Materials and methods: To investigate this, we retrospectively analyzed the properties of immunogenic neoantigens identified in CD8 T-cell recognition screens of predicted neoantigens in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) from 12 melanoma patients and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 14 patients with mesothelioma, triple-negative breast cancer or urothelial cancer. In both experimental settings, CD8 T-cell recognition was assessed using a combinatorial peptide-HLA (pHLA) multimer-based technology. Results: CD8 T-cell responses were detected against in total 34 of the 8103 predicted neoantigens (0.4%). In both PBMCs and TILs, the eluted ligand (EL) score-the predicted likelihood of a pHLA being presented on the cell surface-was the strongest predictor of immunogenicity, followed by predicted HLA binding affinity. Moreover, in the TILs, the frequency of neoantigen-specific CD8 T cells was strongly correlated with these properties across the 12 patients. Conclusions: These findings underscore the value of both EL score and HLA binding affinity as key predictors of neoantigen immunogenicity in different tumor types. Furthermore, we demonstrate for the first time an immunodominance hierarchy of neoantigen-specific CD8 T-cell responses across patients in

Indexed as

CD8 T-cell recognitioneluted ligand scoreHLA binding affinityimmunodominance hierarchyneoantigen immunogenicitypHLA multimer screen

Identifiers

PMID40756430
PMCPMC12318345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.