Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756428›Full record

ArticleJournal of social and personal relationships2025

Trust in close relationships revisited.

Omar J Camanto, Lorne Campbell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of social and personal relationships, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Omar J CamantoUniversity of Western Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4012-9777
Lorne CampbellUniversity of Western Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9071-4845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trust is widely regarded as a fundamental psychological concept in the study of relationships yet-rather than being investigated as a primary, material focus-is often relegated to serving as a proxy for and/or a means to facilitate the exploration of aspects of relationship quality and functioning. We conducted two measurement-focused studies to garner deeper insight into the nature of trust in romantic relationships and explore an account of trust that reframes its development as a process of construction, rather than addition. In Study 1 (

Indexed as

bifactor modelinginvariance testingmeasurementromantic relationshipsTrust

Identifiers

PMID40756428
PMCPMC12316384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.