Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756423›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Enhancing telemedicine service quality through sentiment analysis of user review dataset in Indonesia.

Edi Sutoyo, Muhammad Cekas Permana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edi SutoyoDepartment of Information Systems, Telkom University, Bandung, West Java 40257, Indonesia.
Muhammad Cekas PermanaDepartment of Information Systems, Telkom University, Bandung, West Java 40257, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentiment analysis, a field within natural language processing, text mining, and computational linguistics, evaluates user opinions and product ratings. This article describes a dataset of user reviews collected from telemedicine applications in Indonesia to understand sentiments related to service quality. The dataset comprises 255,679 textual reviews containing positive and negative feedback, offering valuable input for analyzing user experiences. Reviews were sourced from publicly available platforms, ensuring diversity in user perspectives. The dataset exhibits significant class imbalance, with negative reviews constituting a small proportion compared to positive reviews (ratio exceeding 1:14). To address this imbalance, advanced resampling techniques, including Easy Data Augmentation (EDA), were applied. The dataset underwent rigorous preprocessing to remove noise, standardize content, and tokenize reviews for compatibility with deep learning models. This dataset has been utilized with architectures such as SRNN, 1D-CNN, 1L-LSTM, and BiLSTM for sentiment classification. Generated word clouds highlight frequently mentioned terms, enabling exploratory analysis. The dataset is publicly available, providing a resource for benchmarking sentiment classification algorithms and studying the impact of imbalanced data handling on model performance. This work contributes to enhancing telemedicine service quality and advancing Indonesian natural language processing research.

Indexed as

Data augmentationDeep learningImbalanced dataSentiment analysisTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40756423
PMCPMC12318256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.