Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756407›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2025

Radiation exposure in recurrent medical imaging: identifying drivers and high-risk populations.

Juan Chen, Jianjun Zheng, Qun Zhang, Jingfeng Zhang, Qi Dai, Dandan Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juan ChenNingbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Jianjun ZhengNingbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Qun ZhangNingbo Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo, China.
Jingfeng ZhangNingbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Qi DaiNingbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Dandan ZhangNingbo Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging modalities constitute indispensable diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making tools in contemporary clinical practice. These modalities are pivotal in disease detection, longitudinal monitoring, and treatment response assessment. However, the progressive accumulation of radiation exposure from recurrent imaging procedures has sparked significant clinical concerns regarding potential carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health implications. This review analyzes the driving factors of recurrent medical imaging examinations, identifies high-risk populations, and evaluates the potential health risks associated with cumulative radiation exposure, aiming to optimize imaging techniques and dose management strategies. By integrating global radiation exposure data (e.g., UNSCEAR reports) and multicenter clinical research evidence combined with a literature review and dosimetry models, the study reveals the high-risk nature of emergency department patients, chronic disease patients, children, and female populations in recurrent imaging. Clinical needs, demographic characteristics, technological misuse, and uneven healthcare resource allocation are identified as key drivers of recurrent imaging. This review further highlights that short-term, high-frequency imaging accelerates cumulative radiation dose accumulation, potentially elevating long-term health risks, while long-term, low-dose exposure is associated with cardiovascular diseases and malignancies. Based on the linear no-threshold (LNT) model and evidence of DNA repair mechanisms, the study proposes individualized risk assessment to optimize imaging intervals and dose modulation techniques to balance diagnostic efficacy and radiation safety. The policy implications of this research include advocating for enhanced radiation safety education and targeted management strategies for high-risk populations and providing empirical support for updating international radiation protection guidelines, thereby facilitating the clinical implementation of the "As Low As Reasonably Achievable" (ALARA) principle.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingRadiation ExposureFemaleHumansRadiation DosageRisk AssessmentRisk Factorscumulative radiation exposuredose optimizationradiation exposureradiation protectionrecurrent imaging

Identifiers

PMID40756407
PMCPMC12315917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.