Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756403›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Exploring strategies to connect formerly incarcerated individuals with community pharmacist-administered injectable naltrexone services.

Jason S Chladek, Michelle A Chui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jason S ChladekNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Michelle A ChuiDivision of Social and Administrative Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI, United States.

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002375 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Vivek Prabhakaran · 2017 to 2026
$8.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002375NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: For formerly incarcerated individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD), the use of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is critical, especially when these individuals transition out of correctional facilities and back into their communities. Unfortunately, few formerly incarcerated individuals use MOUD upon community reentry, often due to challenges with accessing treatment. As a result, this population remains at high risk of overdose and/or rearrest. In Wisconsin, community pharmacists are a promising resource for improving access and use of MOUD among formerly incarcerated individuals, specifically by administering injectable naltrexone. However, community pharmacists remain underutilized due to several barriers across the socioecological scale. Accordingly, this study used a participatory approach to explore strategies for addressing these barriers and connecting formerly incarcerated individuals to community pharmacist-administered injectable naltrexone. Methods: Five community pharmacists with experience administering injectable naltrexone and treating formerly incarcerated patients participated in three iterative semi-structured focus groups. The focus groups were conducted virtually, and Mural, an online collaborative whiteboard, was used to take notes on each focus group. Respectively, the goal of each focus group was to (1) discuss perceptions of existing barriers and prioritize barriers to be addressed based on perceived impact and feasibility, (2) identify and rank potential strategies for addressing the prioritized barriers based on perceived impact and feasibility, and (3) brainstorm strategy details/components and identify potential challenges related to the prioritized strategies. Focus groups were analyzed via deductive content analysis using a priori categories derived from the focus group goals. Results: In the first focus group, the participants prioritized two barriers to be addressed: lack of awareness of community pharmacist-administered injectable naltrexone services and lack of interagency collaboration among primary care clinics, community pharmacies, and correctional facilities. In the second focus group, the participants identified several strategies for addressing lack of awareness and/or lack of interagency collaboration, but prioritized pharmacist-led education targeted at correctional staff. Lastly, in the third focus group, the participants brainstormed several additional goals and topics for the educational strategy, including sharing existing resources, educating on required patient information, educating on providing patient information via prescriptions, establishing points of contact, emphasizing cost-benefits, and educating on the importance of insurance enrollment. Participants also identified potential challenges with the educational strategy, including inappropriate use of injectable naltrexone, time to implement educational sessions, and facilitating in-person meetings. Discussion: The findings provide a first step toward better leveraging community pharmacist-administered injectable naltrexone for formerly incarcerated individuals.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersPharmacistsPrisonersAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedWisconsinNaltrexoneNarcotic Antagonistscommunity pharmacistscommunity reentryeducationformerly incarcerated individualsinjectable naltrexoneinterventionmedication accessopioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID40756403
PMCPMC12313639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.