ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
What are the key factors contributing to the inequity in healthcare resource allocation? Evidence from China's health panel data from 2009 to 2021.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative AI in healthcare: redefining clinical practice through digital transformation.Health economics review · 2026Article
- The epidemic and socioeconomic factors shock: a long-term dynamic analysis of equity in infectious disease healthcare in China.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Helicopter versus GROUND emergency medical services in mountainous trauma care: a comparative cohort study on time efficiency, golden hour achievement, and clinical outcomes in the Qinba region.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Spatiotemporal evolution and spatial benefit analysis of the coupling coordination of China's three medical systems.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Determinants of ADHD Health Literacy and Public Awareness of Child-Friendly City Policies in Wenzhou: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
- Policy frameworks for promoting public hospital development in major economies: implications for China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Risk-adjusted capitation payment for outpatient services in China's healthcare insurance: a case study of an affluent city in southern China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Work-family conflict and occupational fatigue among clinical nurses in China: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Co-evolution of private and public hospitals: spatiotemporal disparities, geospatial interactions, and social determinants over 19 years in Sichuan, China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As economic growth drives higher demand for health services, equitable health resource allocation becomes crucial to meet diverse healthcare needs. Since China's reform and opening-up, increased government healthcare investment has not fully resolved regional disparities. Existing studies, often relying on methods other than the concentration index, fail to comprehensively analyze the link between resource inequities and economic factors. This study uses the concentration index and its decomposition to assess regional disparities and identify determinants of inequity, offering practical recommendations for optimizing resource distribution in China and similar developing nations. Methods: This study analyzed China's healthcare resource allocation (institutions, beds, and workforce) from 2009 to 2021 using the concentration index to measure equity across socio-economic regions and its decomposition method to identify contributing factors to inequality. Results: From 2009 to 2021, the numbers of institutions per 1,000 people (IPK), beds per 1,000 people (BPK), doctors per 1,000 people (DPK), technicians per 1,000 people (TPK), and nurses per 1,000 people(NPK) in China increased. The concentration index (CI) for IPK remained negative, while BPK's CI turned negative after 2013. CIs for DPK, TPK, and NPK stayed positive. The CI for IPK's absolute value rose, while others decreased. Factors like population size (PS), population density(PD), geographical Location(GL), maternal mortality rate(MMR), rate of born-baby weighting less than 2.5 kg (RBWL25), and perinatal mortality rate (PMR) influenced unequal healthcare resource distribution, with PS and RBWL25 favoring developed areas, and PD, GL, and MMR favoring less developed regions. Additionally, urbanization level (UL), Out-of-Pocket (OPP), per capita health expenditures(PCHE), per capita gross domestic product(PCGDP), disposable income of urban residents(DIUR), government health expenditures (GHE), and number of insured(NI) positively impacted resource allocation to developed provinces, with varying effects. Conclusion: This study analyzes 2009-2021 panel data, revealing growth trends and regional disparities in China's healthcare resource equity, focusing on institutions, beds, and workforce. Need variables (PS, PD, and RBWL25) reduced bed/doctor disparities, while MMR/PMR worsened maternal/nurse inequities. Non-need economic factors concentrated resources in affluent areas despite redistribution efforts. The findings highlight ongoing challenges in equitable distribution and offer crucial policy insights for China and other developing nations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.