Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756387›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Ethical AI in medical text generation: balancing innovation with privacy in public health.

Mingpei Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comprehensive Evaluation of AI Consent Forms in Otolaryngologic Surgery.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mingpei LiangAffiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical College for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medical text generation is transforming public health by enhancing clinical documentation, patient education, and decision support. However, the widespread deployment of AI in this domain introduces significant ethical challenges, including fairness, privacy protection, and accountability. Traditional AI-driven medical text generation models often inherit biases from training data, resulting in disparities in healthcare communication across different demographic groups. Moreover, ensuring patient data confidentiality while maintaining transparency in AI-generated content remains a critical concern. Existing approaches either lack robust bias mitigation mechanisms or fail to provide interpretable and privacy-preserving outputs, compromising ethical compliance and regulatory adherence. Methods: To address these challenges, this paper proposes an innovative framework that combines privacy-preserving AI techniques with interpretable model architectures to achieve ethical compliance in medical text generation. The method employs a hybrid approach that integrates knowledge-based reasoning with deep learning, ensuring both accuracy and transparency. Privacy-enhancing technologies, such as homomorphic encryption and secure multi-party computation, are incorporated to safeguard sensitive medical data throughout the text generation process. Fairness-aware training protocols are introduced to mitigate biases in generated content and enhance trustworthiness. Results and discussion: The proposed approach effectively addresses critical challenges of bias, privacy, and interpretability in medical text generation. By combining symbolic reasoning with data-driven learning and embedding ethical principles at the system design level, the framework ensures regulatory alignment and improves public trust. This methodology lays the groundwork for broader deployment of ethically sound AI systems in healthcare communication.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceConfidentialityElectronic Health RecordsPrivacyPublic HealthHumansAI ethicsbias mitigationethical challengeshealthcare regulationlegal compliancemedical AIprivacy protectiontext generation

Identifiers

PMID40756387
PMCPMC12313694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.