ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Ethical AI in medical text generation: balancing innovation with privacy in public health.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in public health: a systematic review on technological efficacy, ethical dilemmas, and governance pathways.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Comprehensive Evaluation of AI Consent Forms in Otolaryngologic Surgery.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Towards precision medicine in Tourette syndrome: a perspective on AI-driven predictive modelling and personalised care.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
- Healthcare Professionals' Interactions with Families of Hospitalized Patients Through Information Technologies: Toward the Integration of Artificial Intelligence.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medical text generation is transforming public health by enhancing clinical documentation, patient education, and decision support. However, the widespread deployment of AI in this domain introduces significant ethical challenges, including fairness, privacy protection, and accountability. Traditional AI-driven medical text generation models often inherit biases from training data, resulting in disparities in healthcare communication across different demographic groups. Moreover, ensuring patient data confidentiality while maintaining transparency in AI-generated content remains a critical concern. Existing approaches either lack robust bias mitigation mechanisms or fail to provide interpretable and privacy-preserving outputs, compromising ethical compliance and regulatory adherence. Methods: To address these challenges, this paper proposes an innovative framework that combines privacy-preserving AI techniques with interpretable model architectures to achieve ethical compliance in medical text generation. The method employs a hybrid approach that integrates knowledge-based reasoning with deep learning, ensuring both accuracy and transparency. Privacy-enhancing technologies, such as homomorphic encryption and secure multi-party computation, are incorporated to safeguard sensitive medical data throughout the text generation process. Fairness-aware training protocols are introduced to mitigate biases in generated content and enhance trustworthiness. Results and discussion: The proposed approach effectively addresses critical challenges of bias, privacy, and interpretability in medical text generation. By combining symbolic reasoning with data-driven learning and embedding ethical principles at the system design level, the framework ensures regulatory alignment and improves public trust. This methodology lays the groundwork for broader deployment of ethically sound AI systems in healthcare communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.