ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Network analysis of depressive symptoms, cognitive functioning, and life satisfaction among healthcare workers.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression and cognitive impairment among healthcare workers significantly affect their life satisfaction (LS). This study used network analysis to explore the associations between depression, cognitive symptoms, and LS in healthcare workers. Methods: A total of 655 healthcare workers were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression (PDQ-D), and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF). Regularized partial correlation network analysis was conducted, focusing on the strength values and predictability of each item in the network. The R software was used for statistical analysis and visualization of the network. Results: The average PHQ-9 depression score was 4.79, while the mean cognitive symptoms score was 15.38 (Our score range for all participants: PDQ-D 0 - 70; PHQ-9 0 - 27). Network analysis revealed that PDQ12 ("Trouble getting started"), PDQ13 ("Drifting"), and PDQ17 ("Remembering numbers") were the central symptoms of the entire depression-cognition network. PHQ1 ("Anhedonia"), PHQ7 ("Concentration"), and PDQ 13 ("Drifting") were the most critical bridge symptoms connecting depression and cognition. The three symptoms of PHQ2 ("Sad Mood"), PHQ4 ("Fatigue"), and PDQ 13 ("Drifting") had the strongest negative correlations with LS. Gender showed no significant relationship with global network strength, edge weight distribution, or individual edge weights. Conclusion: This network analysis identified several central symptoms, including "Trouble getting started", "Drifting", and "Remembering numbers". It also identified bridge symptoms such as "Anhedonia", "Concentration", and "Drifting". These findings provide important evidence for the development of targeted interventions. Furthermore, measures such as improving emotional management, increasing rest periods, and providing psychological support may help alleviate fatigue and low mood, enhance attentional functioning, and ultimately improve life satisfaction among healthcare workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.