ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Assessing Readiness and Sustainability for Integrated Care in Ontario, Canada with the Integrated Care Leadership Survey.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementing the collaborative chronic care model for mental health: a nonrandomized clinical trial.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ontario, Canada, is shifting to a more integrated healthcare delivery system through the Ontario Health Team (OHT) initiative. The extent to which OHTs have the capabilities to engage in integrated care is unknown and important to designing implementation supports. This article describes the development and psychometric testing of the Ontario Integrated Care Leadership Survey (OICLS), in 30 OHTs. The OICLS was informed by the Context and Capabilities for Integrated Care framework (CCIC). Methods: The 42-item survey was distributed electronically to 765 eligible leaders across 30 OHTs; 480 (63%) responded representing approximately 600 organizations. Item analyses and scale psychometric analyses were undertaken to reduce the number of items in the CCIC survey tool while maintaining validity and reliability. Results: The OICLS survey is comprised of 10 domains covering 12 of 17 capabilities identified in the CCIC. In the total sample, Cronbach's alpha exceeded 0.7 for nine of the ten domains. Descriptive responses to each of the 39 OICLS closed-ended survey questions illustrate the areas of strength and weakness and where supports are warranted to advance the formation of integrated care delivery systems. Conclusion: The OICLS offers a brief and valid assessment of foundational aspects of multi-organizational integrated care initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.