ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Nomogram for Predicting Postoperative Major Bleeding in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Retrospective Study.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- T.O.HO.-PCNL Score for Predicting Success of Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy: A New Score Development Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram for estimating the risk of postoperative major bleeding in patients who underwent surgery for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methods: This retrospective study included 493 patients who had undergone unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi at Third Xiangya Hospital from January 2022 to June 2024. Patients were temporally divided into a training set (the first 70% of treated patients) and a validation set (the last 30%). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and multivariable logistic regression were employed to identify independent predictors of major bleeding upon which a nomogram was based. Key findings and limitations: This study retrospectively analyzed 493 patients, of whom 86 suffered from major bleeding. Six independent risk factors were identified: solitary kidney, renal parenchymal thickness, surgical staging, surgical approach, tract size, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The nomogram achieved an area under the curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-0.87) in the training set and that of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.75-0.92) in the validation set. A decision curve analysis indicated that the nomogram is clinically valuable for predicting bleeding risk when the probability threshold is set between 0.04 and 0.89 in the training set. Limitations include the lack of external validation, which may affect the generalizability of the model. Conclusions and clinical implications: The nomogram serves as an effective tool for predicting the risk of major bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy and for aiding in preoperative assessments, helping surgeons identify high-risk patients for more informed decision-making. Patient summary: The study has identified the key factors that predict major bleeding following percutaneous nephrolithotomy, including the aspects of kidney condition and surgical techniques. This model can assist surgeons in identifying patients at a higher risk of bleeding and in enhancing surgical safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.