ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2025
Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Dissection for Pediatric Deformity.
Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The posterior approach to the thoracic and lumbar spine remains the most commonly used method for treating idiopathic scoliosis (IS). A detailed understanding of the relevant anatomy reduces iatrogenic complications, such as durotomy and pneumothorax, while an efficient surgical technique minimizes operative time and blood loss. Few video-based resources detailing step-by-step exposure of the posterior elements are available. Such videos would enhance trainee preparation prior to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for IS. This technique article reviews the authors' preferred surgical approach, focusing on the pearls and pitfalls of errant techniques. The intended audience includes orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery trainees. Additionally, it provides a sample pre-test to evaluate trainee knowledge preoperatively (see Appendix). Key concepts: (1) Subperiosteal dissection after splitting the apophysis is essential to achieving hemostasis.(2) Errant dissection of the thoracic spine can cause durotomy, pneumothorax, and neurologic injury.(3) Supraspinous ligament violation near the UIV can increase the risk of junctional kyphosis.(4) Preserving the UIV and LIV facet joints is essential to maintain adjacent segment joint health.(5) Safe placement of all spinal instrumentation (hooks, screws, and sublaminar fixation) requires adequate spinal exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.