Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756142›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2025

Loss of Reduction in Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures: Risk Factors From a Prospective Multicenter Registry.

Apurva S Shah, Zoe E Belardo, Mark L Miller, Michael C Willey, Susan T Mahan, Divya Talwar, Pediatric Distal Radius Fracture (PDRF) Study Group, Donald S Bae

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Socioeconomic Disparities in Secondary Procedures for Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026
    Article
  2. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in children with distal radius torus fractures: A case-control analysis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Apurva S ShahThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Orthopaedics, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Zoe E BelardoThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Orthopaedics, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mark L MillerWashington University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Michael C WilleyUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Susan T MahanBoston Children's Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston, MA, USA.
Divya TalwarThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Orthopaedics, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pediatric Distal Radius Fracture (PDRF) Study Group
Donald S BaeBoston Children's Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Despite numerous single-center studies, uncertainty regarding the management of unstable pediatric distal radius fractures persists. The purpose of this investigation was to report patient factors and fracture characteristics that influence loss of reduction (LOR) or need for secondary procedures following closed reduction of pediatric distal radius fractures in a large, prospective multicenter cohort. Methods: Children aged 4-18 years old undergoing closed reduction for a displaced distal radius fracture were identified from the multicenter Pediatric Distal Radius Fracture (PDRF) Registry. Radiographic LOR was defined as a change in angulation ≥10° or an increase in translation of ≥2 out of 5 categories. Bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regressions were performed. Results: In total, 616 children (69% male) with a mean age of 10.5 ± 3.4 years were included. The majority of subjects sustained bicortical metaphyseal distal radius fractures (68%), followed by Salter-Harris II physeal fractures (26%). The rate of radiographic LOR was 44% (271/616), and 11% (70/616) of fractures shifted ≥20°. On multivariate analysis, metaphyseal bicortical fracture pattern (OR = 2.3), prereduction translation of ≥51% (OR = 2.3), and nonanatomic closed reductions (OR = 1.9) independently increased the odds of LOR. Patient age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were not significant predictors for LOR. Ultimately, 8% of children (47/616) underwent secondary procedures, including repeat closed reduction or operative treatment. Conclusions: Redisplacement of pediatric distal radius fractures after closed reduction is common (44%) and is greatly influenced by fracture characteristics. Roughly 11% of fractures will shift ≥20° after closed reduction and 8% undergo secondary procedures. Bicortical fracture pattern, prereduction fracture translation ≥51%, and nonanatomic closed reductions are independent risk factors for redisplacement. Dedicated effort should be made to minimize fracture translation at primary closed reduction, not because of remodeling potential, but to minimize the risk of angulation-driven LOR. Key Concepts: (1)Approximately 4 out of 10 pediatric distal radius fractures experience re-displacement after closed reduction and 1 out of 10 will shift ≥20°.(2)Bicortical fracture patterns, prereduction fracture translation ≥51% of the radial shaft width, and nonanatomic closed reductions are independent risk factors for loss of reduction.(3)Any residual fracture translation at the time of closed reduction significantly increases the likelihood of redisplacement. Level of Evidence: Level II: Prospective cohort study.

Indexed as

Closed reductionFracture managementLoss of reductionPediatric distal radius fracture

Identifiers

PMID40756142
PMCPMC12317416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.