ArticleFrontiers in materials2024
Accurate informatic modeling of tooth enamel pellicle interactions by training substitution matrices with Mat4Pep.
Article in Frontiers in materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular matrices direct the formation of mineral constituents into self-assembled mineralized tissues. We investigate the protein and mineral constituents to better understand the underlying mechanisms that lead to mineralized tissue formation. Specifically, we study the protein-hydroxyapatite interactions that govern the development and homeostasis of teeth and bone in the oral cavity. Characterization would enable improvements in the design of peptides to regenerate mineralized tissues and control attachments such as ligaments and dental plaque. Progress has been limited because no available methods produce robust data for assessing organic-mineral interfaces. We show that tooth enamel pellicle peptides contain subtle sequence similarities that encode hydroxyapatite binding mechanisms by segregating pellicle peptides from control sequences using our previously developed substitution matrix-based peptide comparison protocol with improvements. Sampling diverse matrices, adding biological control sequences, and optimizing matrix refinement algorithms improve discrimination from 0.81 to 0.99 AUC in leave-one-out experiments. Other contemporary methods fail regarding this problem. We find hydroxyapatite interaction sequence patterns by applying the resulting selected refined matrix ("pellitrix") to cluster the peptides and build subgroup alignments. We identify putative hydroxyapatite maturation domains by application to enamel biomineralization proteins and prioritize putative novel pellicle peptides identified by In-StageTip (iST) mass spectrometry. The sequence comparison protocol outperforms other contemporary options for this small and heterogeneous group and is generalized for application to any group of peptides. As a result, this platform has broad impacts on peptide design, with direct applications to microbiology, biomaterial design, and tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.