ArticleNature reviews. Methods primers2024
Image-based 3D genomics through chromatin tracing.
Article in Nature reviews. Methods primers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nuclear mechanotransduction: tools for mechanical perturbation and chromatin characterization.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2026Review
- Genome-wide absolute quantification of chromatin looping.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026Article
- Simultaneous modeling of chromatin conformation changes from multiple single-cell interaction maps with ChromMovie.Genome research · 2026Article
- Investigating Phase Separation in Genome Folding via Multiscale Computational Modeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Differential analysis of image-based chromatin tracing data with Dory.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- CRISPR live-cell imaging reveals chromatin dynamics and enhancer interactions at multiple non-repetitive loci.Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- FAIR sharing of Chromatin Tracing datasets using the newly developed 4DN FISH Omics Format.ArXiv · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Correct organization of higher-order genome folding is essential for the regulation of gene expression, DNA replication and other genomic functions. Technological advances in high-throughput sequencing-based methods have allowed for systematic profiling of the fundamental architectural features of chromatin organization at the genome level. However, how chromatin is folded in 3D space at single-cell and single-chromosome-copy resolution in intact cells and tissues has been a long-standing question owing to a lack of appropriate methodology. Recent advances in chromatin labelling, imaging and automated fluidics technologies have led to the development of chromatin tracing, enabling direct mapping of the 3D chromatin folding trajectory in situ at the single-cell and single-molecule level. Within nearly a decade of its development, chromatin tracing has been applied at different genomic scales and to a spectrum of cell types and model organisms, improving our understanding of the structures, mechanisms and functions of chromatin organization in various biological and medical areas. In this Primer, we introduce the experimental principles, data analysis procedures and current applications of chromatin tracing. We describe how chromatin tracing can be combined with multimodal imaging and genetic screening technologies and provide a perspective on the limitations of current chromatin tracing approaches and the direction of technological developments for filling major gaps in discoveries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.