Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756052›Full record

ArticleJournal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons

Navigating Ergonomic Challenges in Pediatric Laparoscopy: Insights from Indian Surgeons.

Sugandh Chadha, Lakshmi Sundararajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sugandh ChadhaDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Kanchi Kamakoti CHILDS Trust Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Lakshmi SundararajanDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Kanchi Kamakoti CHILDS Trust Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the awareness and identify the issues faced by pediatric surgeons in India concerning laparoscopic ergonomics. Methods: An online survey was conducted by circulating a questionnaire consisting of 18 questions among pediatric surgical consultants and trainees in 2023. The questions were used to assess the musculoskeletal issues faced by the surgeons while operating and they included gender, height, experience, complexity of the procedure performed, position of the monitor, operating table height, length of instruments used, and health issues faced due to bad ergonomics. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test, Pearson's score for correlation, ANOVA. Results: A total of 152 pediatric surgeons participated, of which 119 were males and 32 were females, with 96 (62%) working at a teaching institution. 73 (48%) were senior consultants with >10 years of experience. 79 (52%) performed advanced laparoscopic procedures. Neonatal surgeries (71%) were the most challenging. Fifty-four (36%) surgeons faced musculoskeletal illnesses. This was more prevalent among senior grade consultants (58%), female surgeons (50%), surgeons with heights between 155 and 175 cm (81.2%), surgeons older than 60 years (58%), and those performing advanced procedures (75%). Most participants (98%) were keen on improving their laparoscopic ergonomics. 140 (93%) surgeons noted that laparoscopic ergonomics was overlooked at their hospitals and 84 (56%) lacked institutional support for acquiring the necessary infrastructure. Conclusion: Thirty-six percent of surgeons experienced musculoskeletal disorders while performing advanced procedures (75%), and height, female gender, and complexity of procedures were noted to have a positive correlation with the injury.

Indexed as

Ergonomicsfatigueoccupational diseases/epidemiologypediatric laparoscopyquestionnairessurveys

Identifiers

PMID40756052
PMCPMC12316416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.