ArticleJournal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Association of Sacral Index, Sacral Ratio, and Sacral Curvature with Different Types of Male Anorectal Malformation.
Article in Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sacral ratio (SR) is currently the only measurement to quantitatively evaluate sacral development in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs). This study proposes sacral curvature (SC) and sacral index (SI) as a new indicator to qualitatively assess the sacrum and hypothesizes that sacral development, both quantitatively and qualitatively, can be an indicator to predict the type of ARM. The study aims to investigate the difference of SI, SR, and SC between ARM types and the association with the type of ARM. Materials and Methods: This study was prospectively conducted for 18 months. Male patients with ARMs were enrolled and divided into three groups based on the types of ARM: (1) low ARM, (2) intermediate ARM, and (3) high ARM. SI was measured using anterioposterior radiograph (infantogram). SC was measured using lateral radiograph of the sacrum (prone cross-table lateral radiographs). Results: Sixty-three male patients with ARMs were included in the study. SIs were 93.766 ± 8.2309, 99.878 ± 5.832, and 109.481 ± 7.4646 in low, intermediate, and high ARM, respectively ( Conclusions: The higher the rectal level is in an ARM, the lower are the objective measurements of the sacrum. SR was the most common and established parameter to assess the sacral development and its correlation with the level of ARM. However, this study demonstrated that in addition to SR, SC and SI can be a possible predictor for the assessment of the level of ARM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.