Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756014›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

ChatGPT based method for obtaining repeatable and quantitative colorimetric measurements.

Morena Xaba, Sivuyisiwe Mapukata, Teboho Mokhena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Morena XabaDSTI/Mintek Nanotechnology Innovation Centre, Advanced Materials Division, Mintek, 200 Malibongwe Drive, Randburg 2194, South Africa.
Sivuyisiwe MapukataDSTI/Mintek Nanotechnology Innovation Centre, Advanced Materials Division, Mintek, 200 Malibongwe Drive, Randburg 2194, South Africa.
Teboho MokhenaDSTI/Mintek Nanotechnology Innovation Centre, Advanced Materials Division, Mintek, 200 Malibongwe Drive, Randburg 2194, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in the modern industry has been shown to boost productivity in many sectors such as manufacturing, mining, finance, marketing, pharmacy, textiles, and a few more industries. AI is a neural network system that is wired to learn by interacting with humans and by repetition of tasks. A sub-category of AI common to many ordinary citizens is the Chat Generative Pre-training Transformer (ChatGPT) a program of OpenAI Global, LLC., that generates human-like dialogue and responses from the user input. • ChatGPT can be used to determine colorimetric values for the assessment of environmental pollutants such as congo red (CR) and coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) and prove its ability for consistent reproducibility. • Several color models have been developed such as CIE Lab, RGB, and Xyz to quantify colors. • We used ChatGPT, in conjunction with Color Grab which is an Android app, to quantitatively determine the RGB values of the pollutant solutions, and investigated the color difference ΔE, as well as the hue and chroma that facilitates the color absorption of the pollutants. • The results from ChatGPT and Color Grab were confirmed with the well-established ultra-violet visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometer.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChatGPTChromaticityColor differencesColor GrabColorimetryCongo redCoomassie brilliant blueUV-Vis

Identifiers

PMID40756014
PMCPMC12318291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.