ArticleJHLT open2025
Potential intermediate-term survival differences among heart transplant recipients from circulatory death vs brain death donors.
Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential transcriptomic and metabolomic landscape between human hearts donated after cardiac vs brain death.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2026Article
- Novel model to predict survival in DCD heart transplants: Development of a mortality risk score using UNOS data.JHLT open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study builds upon previous analyses by examining heart transplant survival from donation after circulatory death (DCD) vs donation after brain death (DBD) using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, with follow-up extended to 3 years post-transplant. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,453 DCD and 16,561 DBD adult heart transplants from January 2019 to June 2024 using the UNOS database. Propensity scores were generated based on clinically relevant covariates, and 1-to-1 propensity-score matching was performed. Survival analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier curves, with the log-rank test comparing overall survival and the Wald test examining yearly survival rates between DCD and DBD groups. Results: Mortality was not significantly different between DCD and DBD total cohorts (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-1.3, Conclusions: Intermediate-term survival following DCD heart transplantation may be lower compared to DBD transplantation. Further investigation is warranted to identify the underlying factors contributing to this potential disparity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.